Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts

20080324

One-Take Super 8 Event, Oberlin, OH


On April 4th, I will be one of the artists screening an unedited [I will never have seen the product before the night of the screening] reel of super 8 film in Fairchild Chapel on the Oberlin College campus.

For further information, see: One-Take Super 8 Event.

My film is entitled, "I love chips." I will also be providing a live soundtrack.

20080322

[Not a] Recommendation: "Pete Travis makes history."

Vantage Point, dir. Pete Travis, 2008. I mention this film not because this is a recommendation. I mention this film because it is the worst movie that I have ever seen. I am unable to fathom how this script got funding, which gutter they grabbed Pete Travis out of, or why they proposed to execute a film in such a haphazard fashion. This was the sloppiest, most disgusting excuse for a movie I have ever had the displeasure of sitting through. The film tells the story of a supposed U.S.-presidential assassination in Cordoba, Spain. This flimsy premise is told from around 7 or 8 perspectives over the course of the film - each time the president is shot [or around that time], the movie "rewinds" [and this is quote possibly the most annoying, agonizing gimmick in the history of cinema - I felt like I was sitting through a piss-poor version of No Exit] and we are brought back to approx. 20 minutes before the president is shot. Oh, don't worry, I'm not giving anything away. It gets worse. So much worse. Wooden acting - the actors look like they're just as aware as the audience that this script sucks. Poorly executed CGI. AND this is a movie about terrorism - yet the film refuses to take ethics into consideration - it's just like Pete Travis said, "oh, here's a movie, I made it yesterday in iMovie. I thought if I hired enough great actors and had them perform terribly for 80 minutes, it might make a splash - you know, art or something." Oh, Pete Travis... it made a splash for me. I threw up afterwards. [The worst part about all of this: he will get funding for another movie - asshole]

20080316

Recommendation

Diary of a Country Priest, dir. Robert Bresson, 1950. Bresson begins to experiment with paring down the audiovisual experience in this film. This would become his trademark in later films such as 1959's Pickpocket: attempting to reach a state of transcendental audiovisual purity. He also began to use non-actors in this film: the Country Priest is played by non-actor Claude Laydu, though Laydu would go on to achieve some success in acting and directing later. Laydu plays a priest recently assigned to a country town; the film documents his trials in attempting to reconcile the differences between reality and high, religious morals. Ultimately, this is a film about a single individual - Laydu's character - and his struggle to justify his faith toward God. The film follows Laydu's character, as he observes the townspeople in his journal - the journal entries are given to the audience in voice over. Voice over is also used to narrate what the character is doing at various moments - often the narration itself distracts from the sublime power of Bresson's stark visuals. However, given that this is the story of a man obsessed with reality and attempting to embrace the sublime, the oppressive narration makes sense: he is unable to embrace the Grace of God as it exists around him. We are trapped in that state with him; we realize how similar we are to the Country Priest, a man of God.

20080301

Recommendation

THX - 1138, dir. George Lucas, 1971, with Robert Duvall and Donald Pleasance. Set in the 25th century, a man and a woman rebel against a rigidly controlled society that exists entirely inside a world of simulation and consumption. Interesting: Jean Baudrillard would later discuss these ideas in some depth in his work of the 80s and the 90s.

20080228

The rough cut

Alfred Hitchcock and Joseph Stefano were sitting in a screening room viewing a cut of their recently edited together film, Psycho. They made it through and Stefano was thoroughly displeased. He thought that it was awful - trash - and wondered how Hitchcock would make this film work. He turned to Hitch, who was smiling. Hitch turned to him, saw Stefano's face, and immediately reacted, "It's just a rough cut, Joseph."

20080225

Script: "In the Shadow of Sans Soleil"

This is the script from my recently completed video, "In the Shadow of Sans Soleil."


***

0.

For Man Ray

For Fluxus

For Michael Snow

For Chris Marker

Normally, I saw him everyday.

1.

In the past couple of months, I had seen him very little. He contacted me early in December via a cryptic text message.

He wrote: I have become lost in the media and media of all kinds but specifically electronic media. I have become hypnotized by LCD screens and online blogs, CNN anchors and reality television.

10.

Over coffee and cigarettes in South Spain he told me that he wanted to escape into nature - into a forest via horse or perhaps onto the ocean via sailboat - but that the media was by this time everywhere: even when he left it behind, it was copied in his mind.

He told me all this media was reprogramming him, replacing his body with a matrix of mere ones and zeros. He wrote: it seems that all our bodies are being reconstituted.

11.

One evening in a dance club in Monte Carlo, he asked me: do you remember Baudrillard's In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities?

He read from Baudrillard: "... at this point of generalization, of saturation, where it is no more than the zero degree of the political, at this point of absolute reference, of omnipresence and diffraction in all the interstices of physical and mental space, what becomes of the social itself? It is the sign of its end: the energy of the social is reversed, its specificity is lost, its historical quality and its ideality vanish in favor of a configuration where not only the political becomes volatilized, but where the social itself no longer has any name.

"Anonymous. THE MASS. THE MASSES."

He explained: we constitute bodies through the seemingly voluntary consumption of products. We are all placed into categories, more and more specific - age categories, races, sexualities – simultaneously lumped together and sectioned, marketed to and against, exploded and imploded. We are no longer individuals, although we are given that illusion. Instead, we are a single, consuming mass.

100.

He wrote in an e-mail: I'm just back from New York. On the E train, I saw a homeless man, a teenaged boy listening to his iPod, a business man with an open laptop gazing at an abbreviated version of the New York Times.

He said: It seemed wrong that those people should sit there - alone together. These people - these bodies - seemed politically reconstituted and highly individual. In fact, looking, I saw no politic there, no discussion, no collaboration, no consensus. Everything was controlled, diagrammed, sectioned, safe. The homeless man, the teenaged boy, the businessman, took any number of products to create any body of their choosing.

101.

All of these products - personal computers, iPods, personal DVD players - miniature, portable, affordable machines, in general:

He likened them all to knives.

All of these tiny machines seemed violent to him, seemed forceful, seemed penetrating. As though all of us, with headphones on, were being sectioned, divided apart from one another - but not just that, not just divided apart, but also exposed, cut apart, examined, and put back together. It was not so much a sectioning as a quartering, a dismembering, a decapitating.

He asked: how can I cope with this sectional compartmentalization of media, body, machine?

And he said: There seems no way to resist, no point for resistance. I might begin to buy things to fit in and find ways to assimilate. It seems that the best way to fit in is to divide myself off completely.

110.

He told me he was going to attempt to secure a new and completely different body for himself.

He told me that he had just viewed Chris Marker's cine-essay Sans Soleil for the first time.

Therein, he had constituted himself a whole and radically unique biology.

He said: the prospect of emulating Marker's film is attractive to me for a combination of two reasons. The first is the disembodied woman's voice, constantly in observant monologue. The second facet, equally important to me, is the floating camera shots edited into steady montage. If God had had me choose any body for myself, I would have requested this combination for my bodily apparatus, the camera for its pervasive, observant stare, the woman's drone for its seductiveness. I would have been for myself a machine, an unfeeling, constantly seeing machine - with the voice of a woman. I would have been Sans Soleil.

111.

He was in the shadow of Sans Soleil, following, deciphering, reconstituting.

He said finally: I resisted and searched and researched because I believed there was an escape from this closed system, our closed system, consumerism. Instead, I find that one must choose any products he wants to create a body for himself. He must commit himself to product, to capital, to object. For me, my body will be this film - and I will see it to its constitution.

Somehow, I will become Sans Soleil.


***

Many thanks to those who helped me create this video. I now consider the project completed.

I will place screenshots of "In the Shadow of Sans Soleil" in a later post.